A new CERN / LHC – MEGA EXPLOSION  is already pre-programmed.

The first loss of power already happened on December 2, 2009 (just 11 days after the restart)

Press Release dated November 22, 2009 /  December 7, 2009  /  HL

The CERN/LHC Plant will Light up Like a SUPERNOVA EXPLOSION

by Hans Lehner,  President ISQP / ISQR

Singapore / Neuhaus, November 22, 2009 /  December 7, 2009  /  HL

Please note: This is the last warning from the Institute for Space Quantum Physics for the experiments at CERN/LHC recently started on November 21, 2009 in the Geneva, Switzerland, region. Further warnings do not make sense anymore, because they are unfortunately not heeded by those responsible – and the calamity takes its course.

No one will sympathize with the collective of 2,700 CERN/LHC scientists, when the majority of them lose their lives during the next, pre-programmed explosion of the LHC during an emergency shutdown of the facility. Much more deserving of our compassion are those living in Geneva and its surroundings who were not evacuated at the time of the restart even though the CERN physicists have incorrectly understood and interpreted electromagnetism and gravitation until now.

Until today, they have underestimated the effects of the recently discovered supernova energy, the fifth physical elemental force, the effect of which will flow into these experiments, to the amazement of everyone else around the world and not of the clique of scientists in our colleges and universities, who are incapable of learning and who have ignored the discovery of supernova energy on January 6, 2005, because we have not published anything on this topic in scientific journals, such as NATURE and or SCIENCE, but rather have made a publication in the global, daily updated Internet, which – by the way – was invented for worldwide communication at CERN.

Everything begins so harmlessly – and will lead to the most gigantic catastrophe ever experienced in the Geneva region in the next weeks or months.

This madness can no longer be stopped. Now the CERN physicists have also become megalomaniacal, as the Americans before the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, and as the investment bankers before the financial collapse on Wall Street.

See Contact address below:

Hans Lehner, President, ISQP / ISQR

Institute for Space Quantum Physics and

Space Quantum Research

Aatalstr. 1

CH-8732 Neuhaus, Switzerland

Tel.:  +41 55 282 56 51

Fax:  +41 55 282 56 55

e-mail:    postmaster@rqm.ch

also see: www.supernovae-energy.com

Physics in a Crisis

CERN/LHC Management is Scared Stiff

CERN/LHC Media Report of March 2, 2009

The Physically Faulty Design of CERN’s LHC  -  Potentially at High Risk

of Exploding following its Scheduled Restart in 2009

Neuhaus, March 2, 2009/HL

By Hans Lehner. President, ISQP / ISQR

CERN management’s latest media reports are anything but encouraging. At this point, even physics is in a crisis.

The restart of the LHC, scheduled for September 2009 – a full year after its crash of September 19, 2008 – demonstrates that that uncertainties have increased in view of the fact that the damage sustained on September 19, 2008 was far more extensive than that portrayed by the images seen on the Web. Part of the LHC was torn out of its mooring and the copper conductors in the affected section either melted or were pulverized, suggesting temperatures of well over 1,000°C (1,832°F). In that kind of a scenario, superconduction is no longer assured.

According the CERN media reports, the maximum input energy is not expected to be attained until the year 2011. Based on the following facts, this is expedient optimism in its purest form.

Calculations made by the scientific team of the ISQP / ISQR Institute for Space Quantum Physics and Space Quantum Research in Neuhaus/SG have revealed that in the event of an emergency shut-down the 2 x 1,800 mm² or 2 x 30x60 mm cross section of the two LHC copper conductors is not enough to carry and conductively discharge the cutoff power surge of the electromagnets. In some sections, temperatures will rise to 2,400 – 4,800°C (4,352 – 8,672°F). That will first vaporize the liquid helium, then trigger an enormous explosion.

As soon as the liquid helium is vaporized and superconduction has broken down, the diameters selected for the copper conductors, at 2 x 1,800mm², are 3 – 5 times too small. And for a maximum input energy as envisioned for the year 2011, the conductor cross sections should even be upgraded by a factor of 5 to 10 in order to prevent a huge catastrophe, i.e. an even bigger explosion.

Yet since the LHC copper conductors have been built into the accelerator tube over its entire length of 27 kilometers, it is impossible to upgrade the diameter by a factor of 3 to 5, never mind a factor of 5 to 10. Hence our reference to CERN’s LHC as a physically faulty design. 

It is now the duty of the mass media to point out these inconsistencies and to make the public in the Geneva area aware of them before disaster strikes.

Incorrigible Academic Physicists are Squandering Billions in Taxpayer Money

By Hans Lehner, President, ISQP / ISQR

Neuhaus, November 12, 2008 / HL

The CERN crash on September 19, 2008 shows unmistakably that the academic physicists are at their wit’s end. It is not because repairing the LHC will take months – it is figuring out why that crash could and did occur in the first place, considering that a restart at even higher input energy levels, scheduled for the spring of 2009, could entail a scenario of sheer horror. The probability of a super explosion can no longer be ruled out.

It is the arrogance of these academic physicists who think they have a full command of all the fundamentals of physical science, because it is their assumption that there remains nothing new to be discovered in physics, save for the feverishly sought Higgs bosons – after all, everything else has already been discovered.

The academic physicists still lack any knowledge of the following:

1. Magnetic Space Quanta Flux, per Oliver Crane, on permanent magnets and electromagnets. Discovered and published in 1991/1992.

2. Nearly 100,000 supernova or star explosions in the observable universe each and every day. Published by Eddie Baron in NATURE 395 (1998)

    The academic physicists speak only of the Big Bang, which is ridiculous.

3. Space probe anomalies encountered by Pioneer 10 and 11, Galileo, Cassini etc. have not been explained to this day, since the supernova energy alone can explain these deviations.

4. We have mastered nuclear fission and operated nuclear power plants for 40 years, yet in these 40 years the academic physicists have not found a solution for radioactive waste, that being artificial half-life acceleration. That problem can only be solved via the novel science of Space Quantum Physics.

That is also why in recent years academic physics has not come up with any pioneering discoveries, whereas such pioneering discoveries have been made by outsiders and private (ISQP / IRQR) or IBM research institutes (raster tunnel microscopy and superconductors).

The monthly discoveries in medicine as well as in bio and genetic research clearly show that, by contrast, there is something wrong in academic physics, given that nothing new can be built based on an incomplete or fallacious foundation (magnetism, cosmology, Big Bang and gravity).

To put a stop to the squandering of billions in taxpayer money by academic physicists, it is the responsibility of the media to make the public aware of the situation. The public and the responsible politicians have for years been lied to and misled by the academic physicists in their quest for the financial support needed to pursue their megalomaniacal projects (CERN, Higgs bosons).

And given the tendency to overdo things until the damage is done, we should not wait until Geneva experiences a meltdown of a magnitude comparable to that currently witnessed by the financial world and humanity.

Today the biggest setbacks are suffered by the German automotive industry because of misdirected investments in fuel-cell research without the hoped-for success: After 10 years (1995-2005) of research efforts based on erroneous assumptions by the R&D directors and the so-called “expert advisors,” volume production cannot be justified since the life of these cells is only 6-12 months during which life span their effectiveness diminishes from 100% to 50-60%, something that cannot be sold in good conscience.

See Contact address below:

Hans Lehner, President, ISQP / ISQR

Institute for Space Quantum Physics and

Space Quantum Research

Aatalstr. 1

CH-8732 Neuhaus, Switzerland

Tel.:  +41 55 282 56 51

Fax:  +41 55 282 56 55

e-mail:  postmaster@rqm.ch

also see: www.rqm.ch

Bleak Prospects for CERN’s LHC Accelerator

The Physically Faulty Design of CERN’s LHC  -  Potentially at High Risk

of Exploding following its Scheduled Restart in 2009

by Hans Lehner, President, ISQP / ISQR

Neuhaus, October 27, 2008 / HL

The stoppage of the test series at the CERN/LHC on Friday, September 19, 2008, just 9 days after the start on September 9, 2008, demonstrates that the years of planning and the construction of the LHC have been based on a more than skewed physical foundation. By comparison that makes the Leaning Tower of Pisa “piddling kidstuff.”

    The Leaning Tower of Pisa reflects the current state of

     college physics on whose fallacious and incomplete

     foundation CERN’s LHC in Geneva was constructed.

     The consequences will be disastrous if no CRASH test is

     performed on a real LHC electromagnet prior to any other

     tests scheduled for the spring of 2009, because the emergency-

     shut-down cutoff power surges in the event of a helium leak are

     unknown and may potentially trigger an unexpected explosion

     in the LHC.

CERN’s LHC is a physically faulty design – The high risk of an explosion after the restart scheduled for 2009 when operating, as planned, with maximum input energy, cannot be ruled out.

In their planning process and in the construction of the LHC accelerator loop, CERN’s physicists were unaware of the following flaws in their physical foundation:

1.  The existence of supernova energy, the 5^th physical basic force, was not known yet and was therefore neglected. It was not until January 6, 2005, that the Institute for Space Quantum Physics / IRQP discovered the supernova energy. This newly discovered supernova energy will also explain the anomalies experienced by all space probes, something academic physics has not so far been able to do.

2.   The CERN physicists have antiquated ideas of what constitutes electromagnetism because they are unfamiliar with Crane’s magnetic space quanta flux / SQFm and which they have therefore failed to take into account. This now manifests itself dramatically through the electromagnets in the accelerator loop. Since the LHC contains 1,232 magnets, the potential for danger is enormous when operating at even higher energy levels than on that memorable September 19, 2008.

weltweite_inkompetenz_im_bereich.htm/  (word-wide incompetence in this sector)

3.  In the event of an emergency shut-down of the LHC the cut-off power surge, or shut-off current caused by the misunderstood properties of the electromagnets will be 3 – 5 times higher than the input energy last introduced. To ensure additional theoretical safety of the LHC system, still higher energy levels than those used on 9/19/2008 require an amplification factor of at least 6 to 10.

4.  If neither at the LHC nor in laboratories elsewhere in the world crash tests have been performed using the envisioned maximum accelerator energy levels and measuring on a single original helium-cooled accelerator magnet (out of a total of 1,232) the maximum cut-off power surges or shut-off current transients without simulating the effect of an emergency shut-down, the CERN/LHC is doomed to failure alone for the fact that the explosion hazard is augmented by incalculable and irresponsible orders of magnitude, without even taking into account the new supernova energy.

5. It is not the creation of mini black holes that threatens humanity but the danger of an explosion to which the people in the area of Geneva’s LHC are exposed. An explosive force several times that of Hiroshima and Nagasaki must be assumed, since the helium coolant would intensify the explosive impact on the electromagnets and current-carrying conductors, given that the energy levels generated by an emergency shut-down would vaporize them within fractions of a second. Emergency shut-downs of the LHC are triggered automatically the moment the cooling system or superconductor breaks down or the cooling system springs a leak.

6.  The restart of the LHC, scheduled for the spring of 2009, may in fact be delayed by months if not years since CERN’s management as well as CERN’s scientists are unaware of these new considerations.

7.  The above-mentioned considerations are not theoretical conjecture but reflect the results of years of testing and experiments at the Institute for Space Quantum Research at Neuhaus/SG, implemented with supernova energy and a patented miniature accelerator loop 28 cm in diameter, a novel 5-stage electromagnet system and innovative energy technology. During the years 1996 – 1998, IRFQ engineers have shot over 100 expensive high-performance MOS-FET switches to pieces with uncontrolled shut-off power surges.

.                                                                                                        

                                 Power Electronics                                                                                                       Power Electronics

CERN/LHC  Media Report of 9/26/2008

The IRQP Institute warned twice of cooling problems at the CERN/LHC

by Hans Lehner, President, ISQP / ISQR

In response to media information regarding major cooling problems, CERN/LHC has extended the delay for  the restart of the LHC from initially 2 months to 6 months.

According to confidential sources CERN/LHC used only about 6% of the planned maximum energy in its initial tests, which is about 450 GeV (giga electron volts). At full power, operation is planned at energy levels of approx. 7,500 GeV, in other words 16 times more input energy.

One must expect that higher input energy levels will also spawn more significant problems than have been encountered to date.

As early as on 3/31/2007 and again on 7/14/2008, the Institute for Space Quantum Physics pointed out the possibility of dramatic cooling problems in the LHC, which during full-power operation can lead to a breakdown of the cooling system with concomitant unexpected explosions in the LHC, because vaporization of the liquid helium will cause the superconductors to fail.

Since on the surface above the subterranean LHC accelerator loop with a length of 27 km there are also residential buildings, these buildings should be evacuated prior to any full-power tests to prevent possible fatalities.

Wording of 3/31/2007:

“If CERN’s super-expensive LHC (Large Hadron Collider) in Geneva does not promptly succeed in detecting Higgs bosons or if due to excessive vibration the tests cause inadmissible heat generation in the LHC, the result in the Geneva area may be an undesirable cratering that renders a repetition of these tests impossible”.

Wording of 7/14/2008:

“If excessive vibration in the LHC were to cause a vaporization of the liquid helium, leading to a malfunction of the cooling system and the superconductors and potentially triggering an explosion in the LHC, we suggest to the staff of 2,700 CERN scientists that in parallel with the LHC tests they investigate the Crane Monstein effect and the Hooper Monstein effect on permanent magnets – which in turn will verify the existence of the space quanta medium or dark matter. Such measurements are certainly less risky while at the same time leading to a new energy technology, something that cannot be claimed for the LHC tests.

For as long as the staff of 2,700 CERN scientists fails to understand the nature of magnetism and gravity, it would be more beneficial for humanity if CERN were to pursue a new energy technology; humanity is not interested in the Big Bang nor in “black holes,” since these are unlikely to solve today’s energy problems.”

The risk of unexpected explosions in the LHC is greater than the risk posed by producing mini black holes which according to Oliver Crane is around 0%.

In his publication “Central Oscillator and Space Quanta Medium”, Oliver Crane wrote this in 1992, on page 102:

“Unfortunately, black holes represent the exact same impossible, abstract mathematical fictions as this beautiful hypothesis of the Big Bang according to which, after all, there was supposedly parity between matter and antimatter. For unfathomable reasons, the subsequent pair destruction (annihilation) supposedly allowed part of our matter to survive. Then, too, the Bing Bang theory gives not the slightest clue how the primary particles (as the smallest entities in our matter) came to exist in the first place.

Our notices regarding impending cooling problems in the LHC.

Media report of 7/14/2008 ( accessed 363 times )

http://www.rqm.ch/gratulation_und_vielen_dank_an_d.htm  (congratulations and many thanks)

Media report of 3/31/2007 ( accessed 258,352 times )

Higgs-Bosonen.htm